Re: Archive vs Reference

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view
Kathy Laakso (dchs@douglashistory.org)
Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:22:19 -0500



Message-ID: <A3CF0F00A9C348AE9DB881B6DF6513A1@D6M9HM91>
From: "Kathy Laakso" <dchs@douglashistory.org>
Subject: Re: Archive vs Reference
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:22:19 -0500

I've been meaning to ask a similar question about what we have. We have records that businesses have given us to preserve after they went out of business. What about our own organization?

As we were cleaning one day, we found several old paid invoices from our museum shop and from services we used for daily operations. These are maybe 20 or 30 years old. Do we make sure there's a report stating how much we paid for merchandise sold in the museum shop or keep the paid invoice copies? If someone were to research the Douglas County Historical Society's operations 50 years from now, would the reports be enough, or will the original "primary reference resource" material be of use? Or, should we save reports and an example of the bills that came in? Since our society has been around for over 100 years, you can imagine how much "stuff" has accumulated. Kathy Laakso Director, DCHS
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Bill & Barb
  To: localhistory@listserve.uwec.edu
  Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 4:55 PM
  Subject: Archive vs Reference

  What is the difference between an archive and reference materials?

   

  Bill Gover

  Bayfield Heritage Association

   

   

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

  Internal Virus Database is out of date.
  Checked by AVG.
  Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1497 - Release Date: 6/11/2008 8:32 AM



New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view
This archive was generated on Thu Jun 19 2008 - 13:22:33 Central Daylight Time