From: "Kaldjian, Paul J." <KALDJIAN@uwec.edu> Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:00:45 -0600 Subject: RE: Eau Claire County Local Justice System Assessment - Full Study. Message-ID: <E7DFB9C7847A6242BCF1CEDE9AC1D1E3525C8C8F23@CHERRYCOKE.uwec.edu>
This is great, Dan, thank you. Actually, it is unbelievable. The immediat
e concern with the jail facilities and the county's overreach in trying to
steal the river front resource may be just the thing to bring the public in
to a discussion of more fundamental and systemic issues. In our current di
scussions, the generally accepted premise has been that the need for increa
sed capacity is obvious. But this is not so clear, according to the US Dep
t of Justice report you have provided.
This report is brand, brand new. If I read it correctly, the consultants w
ere in town on 19th February 2008 to conduct assessments of jail capacity a
nd occupancy (page 14). It is inconceivable to me how the county can be tr
ying to understand the problem at the very same time that they are confiden
tly stating that $59.1 million will fix the problem. Am I missing somethin
g?
Below, I have pasted a excerpts from my quick reading. These are not inten
ded to take statements out of context, but to provide evidence that jail in
adequacey, the apparent driver for the current expansion, is not how discus
sions should proceed. In fact, the more I go over the report, the more it
seems that specific plans for a jail and its expansion are premature. Unt
il the system wide and policy problems are understood and addressed, buildi
ng a new jail will -- as county supervisors even alluded to on 19 February
-- bring us back to where we are now.
According to the report,
"Eau Claire is safe and its people are pretty well behaved (page 18)."
"The jail is used to house a wide range of inmate types. It is attempting t
o
do too much. Almost anyone can be admitted. A very wide variety of
federal, immigration, out of state, state, and local inmates reside there.
It is
a mixture of three distinct groups: “people we are afraid of, people we a
re
upset with and people we do not know what to do with (page 19)."
"More clearly defining the purpose of the jail is a first step in managing
the
flow into the jail and the length of stay. This will help define the number
and composition of the jail population. Until and unless this is done, the
jail will remain crowded (page 19)."
"The predominant view, the predominant strategy for coping with the
growing workload has been to seek additional resources, add jail beds,
and add program capacity. This represents a near singular strategy aimed
at trying to outrun growth by adding capacity. But the system is up
against substantial resource limits and the strategy is coming under
increased scrutiny because, to some, it does not seem to be working (page 2
0)."
and
"A first conceptual trap has been the view that jail crowding is “the
problem.” A related notion is the view that jail crowding is “the Sheri
ff’s
problem”. It turns out that jail crowding really just a symptom. It is a
symptom of problems within the larger justice system. Success requires a
system-wide approach. One must literally go outside the perceived
“problem” in order to solve it (page 20/21)"
Some of thepeople who were interviewed seem to believe that a new jail will
“solve
the problem”. In fact, a new jail, by itself, may not change very much. N
ew
bed space may be filled quickly. It is also possible that the new emerging
programs will expand the total number of people under correctional
supervision, also fill to capacity, and have very little impact on the numb
er
of people in jail (page 24)."
"Recommendations include increased public participation and better analysis
of existing data to provide information on the jail population, its charac
teristics and needs, put into a proper form, analyzed and routinely reporte
d out. . . . Understanding these population dynamics is essential to unders
tanding why the number of people in jail is increasing (or falling) (page 2
9)."
P. Kaldjian
Geography & Anthropology
University of Wisconsin -- Eau Claire
________________________________
From: sfpj-request@listserve.uwec.edu [sfpj-request@listserve.uwec.edu] On
Behalf Of Drumm, Daniel L. [DRUMM@uwec.edu]
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 5:25 PM
To: sfpj@listserve.uwec.edu
Cc: 'mw2085@charter.net'; 'Ken@Fulgione.net'
Subject: Eau Claire County Local Justice System Assessment - Full Study.
Hot off the Press:
Eau Claire County Local Justice System Assessment
US Department of Justice
National Institute of Corrections
Jail Division
NIC TA-08J1010
Here is the study as promised. You can read these even before most members
of the County Board. I have not read it yet, but from the index, there loo
ks to be a lot of leverage within. Happy reading.
Study: http://tyronecoal.com/NIC2008.pdf
Appendix: http://tyronecoal.com/NICAppendix2008.pdf
Dan Drumm