Message-ID: <003801c8b795$26776c70$55389f04@YOUR0D330DFBAF> From: "Lisa/Bill Lickel" <lickels@netzero.com> Subject: Re: Unnecessary Communication Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 15:40:58 -0500
I agree - this is good networking. Naturally, if there's a personal
request, replying only to the questioner is appropriate. When I ask
people/societies to join (Like I did today at Museum Mingle in West
Bend), I tell them often you might get half a dozen messages one day,
then nothing for a couple of weeks.
Lisa Lickel
Council for Local History
Farmington Historical Society, Inc.
----- Original Message -----
From: Fielding, Andrew P - WHS
To: localhistory@listserve.uwec.edu
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 2:51 PM
Subject: RE: Unnecessary Communication
I must say that I actually appreciate being able to hear the answer to
other people's questions.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
From: localhistory-request@listserve.uwec.edu
[mailto:localhistory-request@listserve.uwec.edu] On Behalf Of
Robert/Joyce Roesler
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 2:44 PM
To: localhistory@listserve.uwec.edu
Subject: Unnecessary Communication
It would be nice if those of us responding to an inquiry who intend to
address only the person asking it would do so by clicking that person's
email address rather than clicking "REPLY", subjecting all of us to
their message.
Robert Roesler
Greenfield Hist. Soc.