Subject: RE: 300 parents? Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 11:14:18 -0500 Message-ID: <9CBE51C748FC4E469D447D1825C64A3C0140701D@COKE.uwec.edu> From: "Alarcon, Eberth G. Jr." <ALARCOEG@uwec.edu>
Colleagues,
The 300 parents figure is especially suspect given the unsigned letter
business and the fact that Mr.. Bennett decided at the last minute not
to appear on the program. To me, he is clearly afraid to have his ideas
challenged in any meaningful way.
Eberth
________________________________
From: sfpj-request@listserve.uwec.edu
[mailto:sfpj-request@listserve.uwec.edu] On Behalf Of Hale, C. Kate
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 8:31 AM
To: eauclairewib@yahoogroups.com; SFPJ
Subject: 300 parents?
I hope many of you got to hear the interview on 88.3 last evening with
Jessica-the supporting calls were just overwhelming, and I felt so
grateful for them and felt so much better after than I had before!
A particular thanks to Eberth Alarcon for calling Mary Jo on her
indiscriminate use of the term "parents"!!!!
And here's my question-she referred to, I believe, something like 300
signatories on that letter to the school board complaining about Beth
Franklin's discussion. Where ARE these signatures, and does the rest of
the public have a right to see them?????
Thoughts?
Kate
English Dept.